This would come as not surprise. On 9/26/16, the Baltimore Gazette, in CLINTON RECEIVED DEBATE QUESTIONS WEEK BEFORE DEBATE, ACCORDING TO SOURCES, said, “The first presidential debate was held and Hillary Clinton was proclaimed the winner by the media.” And this would come as no surprise. “Indeed Clinton was able to turn in a strong debate performance … . … Clinton seemed to have scripted responses ready for every question she was asked at the first debate. She had facts and numbers memorized for specific questions … .” She has always been a strong debater, I think.
But wait! “Multiple reports and leaked information from inside the Clinton camp claim that the Clinton campaign was given the entire set of debate questions an entire week before the actual debate.” Well that would come as no surprise.
Earlier last week an NBC intern was seen hand delivering a package to Clinton’s campaign headquarters, according to sources. The package was not given to secretarial staff, as would normally happen, but the intern was instead ushered into the personal office of Clinton campaign manager Robert Mook. Members of the Clinton press corps from several media organizations were in attendance at the time, and a reporter from Fox News recognized the intern, but said he was initially confused because the NBC intern was dressed like a Fed Ex employee. … The Fox reporter who recognized the intern also immediately looked outside of the campaign headquarters and noted that there were no Fed Ex vehicles parked outside.
What!? Hillary cheated in the debates? Well given her known history that would come as no surprise. But perhaps we can be surprised at the extent of the apparatus that covers for her and promotes her? Now at least we know that there is a favored candidate, and who it is we are supposed to vote for.
Well, I for one, cast my vote for Hillary. Hillary for Prison 2016! I never was very well socialized.
Postscript: Now this comes as a surprise, being as the above story would be completely in character for the Hillary campaign and liberal media. Brandon Weigel, at City Paper, gives a fairly credible argument that the above source is completely bogus. Other than citing Snopes several times, which is a completely unreliable source, Weigel is pretty persuasive that the Baltimore Gazette is just a veneer of a website for the purpose of making stuff up.